Comparison · Shadowtype vs Cotypist

Shadowtype vs Cotypist:
free and open, or rented forever.

The short answer: Shadowtype and Cotypist are both on-device, offline, account-free ghost-text autocomplete apps for Apple Silicon Macs — they tie on the core capability. The deciding difference is the model: Shadowtype is free and open source, runs on all your Macs, and ships zero telemetry, while Cotypist is a recurring $6–9/month subscription ($72–108/year) with opt-out telemetry on 1–3 Macs.

Both are excellent: a local LLM predicts your next words as ghost text in any text field, and Tab accepts, completing in roughly 150 ms on an M2. They’re genuinely close on capability — the real fork is whether you want to buy the tool or keep renting it.

  • Free & open source
  • Zero telemetry
  • All your Macs
  • Open source
The honest comparison

How is Shadowtype different from Cotypist?

Where they tie, we say so. Both are private, local, and account-free — that’s the floor. Shadowtype wins on ownership, telemetry, and device count.

Capability Shadowtype Cotypist
System-wide inline ghost-text completionYesYes
On-device LLM · offline · no accountYesYes
Tab-to-accept word / whole lineYesYes
Model choice (Gemma / Qwen GGUF)YesYes
Per-app instructions & personalizationYesYes
Selection rewrite (⌥⌘K, on-device)YesCompletion only
Local API + MCP server (OpenAI-compatible)YesNo
Telemetry / analytics backendNoneOn by default (opt-out)
Macs you can useUnlimited1 → 3
Free tier100 words/day100 words/day
Pricing modelFree & open source$6–9 / month
RequirementsmacOS 14+ · Apple SiliconmacOS 14+ · Apple Silicon

By the numbers: at a typical $6–9/month, Cotypist costs $72–108 every year; Shadowtype is free, forever. “We didn’t want to build another keyboard you rent forever — Shadowtype is free and open source, on as many of your Macs as you like,” says Shadowtype’s developer.

Figures reflect each product’s public pricing and docs as of June 2026. Cotypist is a fine app — this page is about which trade-offs fit you.

Why people pick Shadowtype

Same local autocomplete. Better ownership.

Free, not every month

Free and open source versus $72–108 every year, forever. Over three years that’s several hundred dollars of difference for the same on-device completion.

Zero telemetry — not opt-out

Cotypist sends anonymous usage and crash data by default; you can turn it off. Shadowtype has no analytics backend to turn off in the first place. Nothing to trust, because nothing is sent.

All your Macs, free

Laptop, desktop, the work Mac — install it on every machine you own, at no charge. Cotypist caps you at one Mac (Plus) or three (Pro).

Local API + MCP for developers

An OpenAI-compatible HTTP endpoint runs on 127.0.0.1 so your scripts, editors, and agents can call the same on-device model — no key, no cloud. A built-in MCP bridge plugs into Claude Code and other MCP clients, and the BYOM picker loads any GGUF.

Questions

Shadowtype vs Cotypist FAQ

Is Cotypist on-device too?
Yes. Cotypist runs a local model and works offline with no account, just like Shadowtype. On the privacy-and-local axis they’re very similar — the difference is the subscription versus free and open source, plus telemetry and device count.
Will Shadowtype cost me more over time?
No — that’s the point. Shadowtype is free and open source with free updates. Cotypist’s $72–108/year keeps recurring for as long as you use it.
Is Shadowtype really free?
Yes. Shadowtype is free and open source — system-wide ghost text, Tab-to-accept, emoji, every model, and the local API, all included with no cap and no account. You can read the source on GitHub.
Do they support the same Macs?
Both require Apple Silicon and macOS 14 or later. Intel Macs are not supported by either.
Can my own scripts, editors, and agents use the same local model?
Yes. Shadowtype exposes an OpenAI-compatible HTTP endpoint on 127.0.0.1 with no key required, so your terminal, editor plugins, and AI agents can call /v1/chat/completions against the same on-device model. A built-in MCP server plugs into Claude Code and other MCP clients, and the BYOM picker loads any GGUF you drop in. Everything is bound to localhost — nothing leaves your Mac. Cotypist doesn’t offer a local API or MCP server.
Is Shadowtype cheaper than Cotypist over time?
Yes. Shadowtype is free and open source, while Cotypist is a $6–9/month subscription, or $72–108 per year. Over three years that is several hundred dollars saved for the same on-device autocomplete.
Ready when you are

The local autocomplete that’s free and open source.

Download Shadowtype free, accept your first word with Tab, and never pay a monthly bill.

  • Free forever
  • No subscription
  • No account
  • Zero telemetry
  • Open source